Jesslin She'Nedra (jesslin) wrote,
Jesslin She'Nedra

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Ah, the Modern Middle-Ages... *grumble*

It’s amazing to me, sometimes, the sheer frustration that being a devil’s advocate brings me. You’d think that knowingly bringing up an unpopular or counter point of view would make me more able to accept my own two-facedness, not to mention the ability to countenance points of view that oppose my own. But still, it’s hard to justify the abstract good in the face of my own very specific desires. Or is that backwards? Anyway, it’s this stupid argument in the SCA about whether or not rapier fighters are deserving of a peerage level award. It’s not even an all-society-encompassing argument, either, but what people are discussing it are more than happy to make loud noises, both for and agin. The argument against is basically,” you may be cool, but you’re not the right KIND of cool,” while the argument for sounds a lot like, ”well, not for me of course, but I have friends that ARE the right kind of cool.” And then we get the argument where my unrecognized cool friends are cooler than your recognized ones. Are not! Are too! Nyah!!!

I don’t get it. Really, it’s discrimination against late-period (16th c.) persona. By the time ‘my’ shaggy little Scottish butt came around, peerages were being bought and sold on the open English market, usually based on cash flow and how many men you could contribute to Elizabeth’s army in case the Spaniards actually found a clue. Or it was some amount of hereditary. ‘Honor’ and ‘chivalry’ had so little to do with it that the very concept is ludicrous. In my world, it’s all those stick-swingin’ hardshells that are obviously inappropriate to the peerages. Which in itself is a specious argument (that may not be the right word, but I like it) since good ol’ Henry Tudor was still sporting some very slick tournament armor courtesy of the Germans. But he wasn’t a peer, he was King God and a knight only by virtue of – well, perhaps ‘virtue’ is the wrong word here… but hereditary nonetheless. Meh.

It’s a stupid argument, why do I even let it bother me? It’s not that we (read: rapier fighters) need a peerage for our own self-agrandisment. It’s the need/desire for a goal coupled with the fact that, protests to the contrary not withstanding, human nature dictates that you will have a different reaction to a duly elevated peer than to that very same person who is not so recognized. Particularly if you don’t know the person very well; you rely on the rank to express that this person is worth listening to unless you have personal knowledge to the contrary. All things being equal, you will think better of a person the higher on the award food-chain they have risen. You can’t help it, it’s hard-wired into your Id. Witness our duly elected government officials.

And all this for a hobby-group that we have to pay to have the joy of fighting in (at least where I am). Sigh Repeat after me, “This is my hobby, I do this for fun. This is my hobby, I do this for fun…”
Tags: sca

  • (no subject)

    I Probably shouldn't post in the middle of the two eps -- we've only seen half of the second round of groups. Sara is indeed the touchy-feely…

  • Sing it, a cappella style!

    Aaaaaand we're off! The new season of Sing Off ( has begun. New chick judge (who I guess I should know, but I don't)…

  • Sing-off! Whoot!!

    I'm finally getting a chance to listen to the new season of Sing-Off (I didn't hear last year's because I flat forgot). Oh. My. God!!! Okay,…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.